CONSCIOUS CONTRACTING SERVICES
Becky Nevin, Counselor - At - Law
A Counselor-at-Law or Attorney-in-Fact serves as a non-licensed agent appointed under a Power of Attorney (POA) agreement, acting exclusively in the interest of the principal. Unlike licensed BAR attorneys, whose allegiance is divided between their client and state regulatory bodies, an attorney-in-fact remains loyal solely to the principal’s directives. This relationship ensures that the principal retains full authority while delegating specific powers as clearly defined within the POA document.
[See Md. Code, Estates & Trusts § 17-103 (duty of agent to act in principal’s interest); American Bar Association, Power of Attorney Overview]
This framework allows individuals to safeguard their unalienable rights, maintain control over their legal identity (ENS LEGIS), and challenge governmental or corporate overreach without compromising their sovereignty. Attorneys-in-fact are not subject to state bar associations and therefore do not risk sanction or disbarment for advancing arguments that question or expose structural flaws in the corporate-commercial legal system.
In contrast, engaging a licensed BAR attorney establishes a “client” relationship, a term historically associated with diminished legal capacity, akin to that of a minor or ward of the court. [See Corpus Juris Secundum, Clients, Vol. 7, § 2] Within this relationship, BAR attorneys “represent” clients by standing in their place—often blurring the distinction between the living individual and the artificial legal person. Their obligations to bar associations and judicial systems may create inherent conflicts of interest. [See Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: General Rule)]
For self-reliant individuals committed to preserving their Creator-given sovereignty, the attorney-in-fact model provides a strategic advantage. It empowers capable adults to assert their rights, manage their own legal affairs, and resist being subsumed into the corporate legal construct—while retaining the ultimate decision-making authority as principal.
“The Practice of Law is an occupation of common right." — Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720
“As per legal precedence, the Practice of Law can not be licensed by any state or State. " — Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239
Expert Services to Ignite Your Sovereignty
Secure Your Sovereignty in Titan Trust’s Unbreakable Foundation
“The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies, either municipal, state, or federal, or even from the Constitution. They exist inherently in every man, by endowment of the Creator, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution, and restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government. The people's rights are not derived from the government, but the government's authority comes from the people. The Constitution but states again these rights already existing, and when legislative encroachment by the nation, state, or municipality invade these original and permanent rights, it is the duty of the courts to so declare, and to afford the necessary relief.”
